Well I had a bit of a disaster here, as I had forgotten this album which is, I think, a really great one. However, I've decided to stay with what I had already chosen.
This is one of my favourite albums, but also I think probably the best Christian album I have. Proper band who are Christians, who for the too few years they worked, did 200gigs a year. Sadly, no more. And in many ways subsequent albums never quite lived up to this one.
Anyway, what's so great about this? Great ideas, themes pursued through, I think, great metaphors and poetry, a great sound ranging from delicate to grunge to folky to rock, and epic moments like Hands in the Air (which isn't about what the title suggests). No cheese, no duff tracks. Great stuff.
PS. ooooooooooohhh!!!! ahhhhhhhhhh! Looking for the image of their album cover I clicked a link and....THEY'RE BACK TOGETHER, new album next year!! AAAAAGAGHAHGHHHHHH!
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
CSL: nature emptied & filled
Just working on Ps.19 and remembered I'd read this last week, on how Christianity empties nature of gods...
Reflections on the Psalms, p81
(I feel bound to note here, that this book of Lewis' is the least theologically helpful I have read (and I've read a lot) and is a reminder that we turn to Lewis not fir purity of theology but for brilliance of thought and expression)
But in another sense the same doctrine which empties Nature of her divinity also makes her an index, a symbol, a manifestation, of the Divine...[he then references Ps.19 & 36]...It is surely because the natural objects are no longer taken to be themselves divine that they can now be magnificent symbols of Divinity. There is little point in comparing a sun-god with the Sun or Neptune with the great deep; there is much in comparing the Law with the Sun or saying that God's judgements are an abyss and a mystery like the sea.
Reflections on the Psalms, p81
(I feel bound to note here, that this book of Lewis' is the least theologically helpful I have read (and I've read a lot) and is a reminder that we turn to Lewis not fir purity of theology but for brilliance of thought and expression)
Friday, October 22, 2010
Stark: missionary Judaism
As everyone knows, the OT teaches that Israel is God's Chosen People, and that this may have been the first significant instance of monotheism...What is far less known, and sometimes denied, is that the Judaism of this era was a missionising faith - probably the "first great missionary religion".
One True God, p52
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Ambition
I remember the older pastor asking me, when I was just starting out in ministry, "Where do you hope to be in twenty years?"I was shocked by his question. Me? Oh I just hope to be servant-hearted enough to go wherever the bishop sends me. I just hope to be a good pastor who loves his people."Be careful son," the wise old man advised. "When you won't admit your ambition, you are setting yourself up for future disappointment when your unacknowledged, unsought ambitions are unrealized or when this sort of lying becomes routine." Ouch.
.......From what I've seen, it's not necessarily a sin to be ambitious for a large salary, or lifelong job security, or a 40-hour work week. These aspirations are worthy goals. What's stupid is to be ambitious for these goals as a Christian pastor.I write all this as a simple, Bible-believing country pastor who never intended to be a bishop, someone who just wanted to be used by Jesus for the good of other people.Yeah, right.
Will Willimon, Leadership
Monday, October 18, 2010
Luther: original sin
Original sin, after regeneration, is like a wound that begins to heal; though it be a wound, yet it is in course of healing, though it still runs and is sore. So original sin remains in Christians until they die, yet itself is mortified and continually dying. Its head is crushed in pieces so that it cannot condemn us.Tabletalk #256
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Stark: complex culture and monotheism
Stark discusses the assumptions of an evolutionary approach to religion, and along the way presents some challenges which I have already blogged. He then confirms that developed monotheism does arise in more complex cultures, but then makes a very interesting exception:
Thus, although it remains significant that such a God is acknowledged in some quite unsophisticated groups, fully developed dualistic monotheism is very uncommon and does only seem to appear in a more complex cultural context. Keep in mind, however, that the ancient Hebrews were far from being the most advanced society of their day. Why them? That remains one of the greatest of all historical questions - and one rather unlikely ever to be fully answered.
p40
Chambers: the surprising wilderness
We may have the vision of God and a very clear understanding of what God wants, and we start to do the thing, then comes something equivalent to the forty years in the wilderness, as if God had ignored the whole thing, and when we are thoroughly discouraged God comes back and revives the call, and we get the quaver in and say - "Oh, who am I?" We have to learn the first great stride of God - "I AM THAT I AM hath sent thee." We have to learn that our individual effort for God is an impertinence; our individuality is to be rendered incandescent by a personal relationship to God (see Matthew 3:17). We fix on the individual aspect of things; we have the vision - "This is what God wants me to do;" but we have not got into God's stride. If you are going through a time of discouragement, there is a big personal enlargement ahead.Utmost, 13th October.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Maxwell: change
The only thing certain about tomorrow is that it will be different from today If you doubt that, consider this: My grandfather had a farm, my parents had a garden, and I've got a can opener! It's a different world from what it was 20 years ago, and it will be different in another 20. But the good news is that the world changes so fast that you couldn't stay wrong if you tried!
The Difference Maker, p88
Thursday, October 07, 2010
Determination
Every morning (well, most mornings) I listen to my MP3 player whilst I walk. The early morning walks were something I started doing twenty years ago at College, when I realised that, for me, early is bad. I’m tired, muddled and, worst of all, my whole life usually looks like one, massive, dark thunderstorm of difficulty. I’m discouraged and ready to give up before the day has started. Over time I noticed that by 10am life was not so bleak, and concluded that some of my problem is the way I’m wired: mornings are pants. But if my morning ‘funk’ (as they used to say) is wiring or chemicals or the like, then maybe there is a way to overcome it, to speed up the natural process. Get out, walk and shake up the wiring and chemicals. It was a revolution. Mornings will always be tough, but oh! the difference. 10am arrives much earlier.
The MP3 player was the next revelation: I could fill my head with something other than the dismal self-generated junk that, with malicious glee, awaited me every morning. And so I have walked and listened most mornings for years.
Today I walked and listened to something that, I hope, helps yet further. It was an interview with an author whose book recorded the lives of a legendary, crack group of marines who were present in various key arenas during World War II. He had interviewed several and when asked what one characteristic he discovered they all shared, he replied: determination, the decision to never quit. For example, one who parachuted behind enemy lines had a faulty parachute; so he braced himself and hit the ground hard. He survived but could not move his legs. On being retrieved and transported to hospital it was discovered he had a broken disk, which presented him with the ‘golden ticket’: no more war, he could go home conscience-free. Instead he worked his way back to health and got himself back to the front to continue fighting with his unit. There were other, similar stories.
Determination. It was another one of those moments. Not quitting is a decision. Now, I’ve had plenty of times when I have worked towards a goal, or dug my heels in over an issue and refused to move, come what may. But they have generally been over selected key issues, whose importance generated resolve. But what about those times when quitting seemed enforced by circumstance, when conditions robbed resolve and quitting did not seem so much a decision, but the aggregate effect of events? Now this may not come as a new idea to you, but for the first time in my life I asked: what if determination is not what you calculate having examined the odds, but is an ongoing attitude that we decide to have? What about a daily decision to not quit, to not be cowed by circumstance? The point the author was making was that these men were not simply determined to achieve a goal, they were simply determined.
For those of us who feel we fall short of World War II veterans and tend towards self-analysis, our problem may be that failure and/or a sense of inadequacy discourages us across the board, not just over the issue that produced it. We look at the failure and conclude (consciously or otherwise) that we have failed/we’d better not try again/we don’t want to let people down another time/make ourselves vulnerable etc. Maybe from this comes a subconscious conclusion that determination only arises in situations where we can see ourselves reasonably clear to succeed. And this isn’t one of them.
But surely this is a policy of diminishing returns, precisely the opposite of our intention. Such thinking robs us of confidence, motivation, clarity and energy. Or, to put it another way, it leads to nothing; because we tend to not try again, tend to increasingly assume we will fail; and not just here, where the problem occurred, but other times, places and circumstances. The fog across our vision here, drifts into every valley.
So we need to stop. And think. Pulling into our shell seems to be a fitting consequence of failure – but in reality it is simply nothing. It’s empty. It achieves zero: it won’t help. Anything. We feel that keeping quiet, or not trying again, will in some way protect us from the future; but in fact that approach is just as likely to lead to the very consequences we are trying to avoid. We shut down, and then fail to grasp opportunities, or feel listless – which then produces a further sense of failure.
Vicious circle.
Instead, take a look at those soldiers: determination, the decision to never quit. Why not us too? What’s the point of being cowed, looking down, not trying? We need to view their results when they denied ‘failure’ the right to inhibit their energy, when they decided to learn their lesson and then forget the disaster, refusing to count it as a closed door. Don’t get me wrong, there are situations where withdrawing is the only thing that will keep us in one piece. But we need clarity, to realistically evaluate which ones those are, and not permit the effects to spread across our personality or every area of life.
Strangely, the commitment to get up again tomorrow and do what needs to be done, without being unduly dampened by the past, often quietens the sepulchral voices calling for retreat to the shadows. Those voices are the worst feature of withdrawal. When we make anaesthetising those voices our priority (through hiding in mediocrity, or pulling limbs into shells) they are still influencing us. But having determination as a priority, waking in the morning and deciding that not quitting is the top priority of the day, it transpires that a considerable amount of energy was being parasitically drawn by the voices. Paradoxically, redirecting energy to the more purposeful priority of determination can make us feel stronger.
#3 March
Well firstly, the ones that got away. We're so close to the end that it's now pretty certain some albums I would have on this list are not going to get Spotifyed in time. So if you get a chance, check these out somewhere else:
Transverse City by Warren Zevon - for an album describing the future, it gets a little dated by reference to contemporary 1980s events; but as this disturbing 'future' is really now, that doesn't matter too much.
Some Kind of Wonderful - my favourite soundtrack is a blast of 1980s slightly left of centre tracks, from the master of teen soundtracks.
The Brendan Voyage - yes, a symphony for orchestra and uillean pipes.
but in the absence of those it's this one:
I saw the No Myth video on the telly, saw the album in the shop and brought home a really odd collection of songs. catchy, fluent, but really I have no idea what's going on half the time. The same poetical complexity as Suzanne Vega, but repeated listens don't necessarily show a co-ordinating theme, though there may be some. And some songs, like Evenfall, are straightforward enough. But the overall result for me has been a really compelling album from Penn (yep, Sean's brother, honest). As he is so unknown these days, and after the hit of No Myth, disappeared from the charts, I have heard no more - but it looks like spotify has a few more avenues.
B the way, the Spotify March has several extra tracks I have never heard. the original album stops at Evenfall, which is a great ending and I would recommend stopping there for the time being.
Transverse City by Warren Zevon - for an album describing the future, it gets a little dated by reference to contemporary 1980s events; but as this disturbing 'future' is really now, that doesn't matter too much.
Some Kind of Wonderful - my favourite soundtrack is a blast of 1980s slightly left of centre tracks, from the master of teen soundtracks.
The Brendan Voyage - yes, a symphony for orchestra and uillean pipes.
but in the absence of those it's this one:
I saw the No Myth video on the telly, saw the album in the shop and brought home a really odd collection of songs. catchy, fluent, but really I have no idea what's going on half the time. The same poetical complexity as Suzanne Vega, but repeated listens don't necessarily show a co-ordinating theme, though there may be some. And some songs, like Evenfall, are straightforward enough. But the overall result for me has been a really compelling album from Penn (yep, Sean's brother, honest). As he is so unknown these days, and after the hit of No Myth, disappeared from the charts, I have heard no more - but it looks like spotify has a few more avenues.
B the way, the Spotify March has several extra tracks I have never heard. the original album stops at Evenfall, which is a great ending and I would recommend stopping there for the time being.
Sunday, October 03, 2010
Flat Earth
The persistence of myth continues to amaze, as I was reading John Maxwell's helpful book The Difference Maker. Once again, as so often, the illustration of Columbus was used to demonstrate how hard it is to accept change: Columbus believes the earth is round, everyone else says it's flat; he sails off, proves his thesis and yet it still takes a generation for this to permeate culture.
In fact Pythagorian thinking had influenced opinion since the 7thC BC, to such an extent that by the time of Columbus practically no one thought the earth was flat, and in fact most intellectuals had never believed this. Columbus' argument was not about the shape of the world but how big it was and the location of Asia (neither of which he was correct about).
As these authors say:
What's more interesting is the hint I came across today that the myth of the flat earth had an element of deliberateness to it, during the 19thC when fostering the impression of an eternal conflict between science and religion was seen as advantageous.
Washinton Irving's highly fictionalised account of Colombus' conflict with priests sank into the popular psyche.
Hmmm.....
(quotations from Wikipedia article 'Myth of the Flat Earth')
In fact Pythagorian thinking had influenced opinion since the 7thC BC, to such an extent that by the time of Columbus practically no one thought the earth was flat, and in fact most intellectuals had never believed this. Columbus' argument was not about the shape of the world but how big it was and the location of Asia (neither of which he was correct about).
As these authors say:
Historians of science David Lindberg and Ronald Numbers point out that "there was scarcely a Christian scholar of the Middle Ages who did not acknowledge [Earth's] sphericity and even know its approximate circumference"
What's more interesting is the hint I came across today that the myth of the flat earth had an element of deliberateness to it, during the 19thC when fostering the impression of an eternal conflict between science and religion was seen as advantageous.
Historian Jeffrey Burton Russell says the flat earth error flourished most between 1870 and 1920, and had to do with the ideological setting created by struggles over evolution.
Washinton Irving's highly fictionalised account of Colombus' conflict with priests sank into the popular psyche.
In 1834, a few years after the publication of Irving's book, Jean Antoine Letronne, a French academic of strong antireligious ideas, misrepresented the church fathers and their medieval successors as believing in a flat earth, in his On the Cosmographical Ideas of the Church Fathers. Then, In 1837, the English philosopher of science William Whewell first identified, in his History of the Inductive Sciences, two minimally significant characters named Lactantius (245-325, also mocked by Copernicus' in De revolutionibus of 1543, as someone who speaks quite childishly about the Earth's shape, when he mocks those who declared that the Earth has the form of a globe) and Cosmas Indicopleustes, who wrote his "Christian Topography" in 547-549. Whewell pointed to them as evidence of a medieval belief in a Flat Earth, and other historians quickly followed him, even though it was hard to find other examples
Hmmm.....
(quotations from Wikipedia article 'Myth of the Flat Earth')
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)