Monday, March 29, 2010

Chambers: reality

The great need for the Christian worker is to be ready to face Jesus Christ at any and every turn. This is not easy, no matter what our experience is. The battle is not against sin or difficulties or circumstances, but against being so absorbed in work that we are not ready to face Jesus Christ at every turn. That is the one great need, not the facing our belief, or our creed, the question whether we are of any use, but to face Him.

Oswald Chambers, My Utmost for His Highest, (29th March)

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Postman: defining intelligence

Since intelligence is primarily defined as one's capacity to grasp the truth of things, it follows that what a culture means by intelligence is derived from its important forms of communication.  (p25)

(& therefore our definition of intelligence in the TV (and now internet age) is defined by what that medium is actually capable of communicating - which, in Postman's view is trivia, and therefore the trivial becomes a kind of intelligence, or the intelligent become more trivial.  Ridiculous!  Or, should we perhaps  be worried  about how many people with enormous amounts of qualifications worked very hard to produce Big Brother?)

Ethos reduces control

Purpose and principle, clearly understood and articulated, and commonly shared, are the genetic code of a healthy organisation.  To the degree that you hold purpose and principles in common among you, you can dispense with command and control.  People will know how to behave in accordance with them, and they'll do it in thousands of unimaginable and creative ways.  The organisation will become a vital, living set of beliefs.

Dee Hock, The Birth of the Chaordic Age, quoted in Organic Church, p124.

Blankets for relativists

Convinced relativists, like people everywhere, are not immune to difficulties and troubles. A global economic downturn or a devastating earthquake does not discriminate between relativists and exclusivists. When relativists are struck down by the exigencies of life, it is rare that cogent arguments for truth will draw them. More likely, it is practical care and concern shown by loving Christians. We cannot provide warmth to a cold relativism, but we can wrap a blanket around a shivering relativist.

Mark L Y Chan

Postman: the real danger of TV

...television is at its most trivial and, therefore, most dangerous when its aspirations are high, when it presents itself as a carrier of important cultural conversations.  The irony here is that this is what intellectuals and critics are constantly urging television to do.  The trouble with such people is that they do not take television seriously enough.  For, like the printing press, television is nothing less than a philosophy of rhetoric. (p16-17)

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Keller: money

When you see Him dying to make you His treasure, that will make Him yours.   Money will cease to be the currency of your significance and security, and you will want to bless others with what you have.

Money cannot save yo from tragedy, or give you control in a chaotic world.  Only God can do that.

Counterfeit Gods, p 67&68

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

#13 Jesus Freak


Having lost my original list I think my countdown order might go a bit adrift.  Ho hum.

Anyway, here is another musical turning point for me.   This time the profound affect was on my attitude towards Christian music.  When I became a Christian I was well into music (pirating albums every week from the tape library) and it never occurred to me that there was any such thing as Christian music.  I soon wished it hadn’t.  It was the era when being a Christian and owning a guitar meant you should start a band.  People’s attitudes to CCM are still badly affected by this;  although they are also affected by snobbery – I’ve watched people (including Christians) go off music simply because they discovered it’s Christian.  I think they might be afraid the big kids will laugh at them.

Well, it all changed for me in 1995.  Up til then I owned two increasingly-unplayed Amy Grant albums and a few frequently played Michael Card albums but nothing exciting because Christians don’t make that kind of album.   Then some of our YP lent me Jesus Freak and I went into shock.  Partly because it was grungy in places and included rap (anathema!) – but mostly because I had never heard  Christian music with such high production values, no bad tracks and which required being played very loud on a big stereo (the effect will be limited on Spotify, I’m afraid).  And it even had a poem at the end. And made fun of cheesy gospel singers.

Possibly no one else had ever heard these things either, as it soon became the biggest selling CCM album of all time and was, I think, the first to get its own rack in some big, secular US record stores.   DC Talk was, for a few years, the biggest Christian band ever.

And they didn’t just say “I love you Lord” 50 different ways:

Bombarded by philosophies that satisfy the surface
I flee to something deeper
At the risk of seeking purpose
How can I hang in this environmental state of being
When everything I'm striving for
Is nothing that I'm seeing


Anyway, I think it is a milestone album and opened up the door for me to a whole load of great bands.

Highlights for me.....?    I got into it through Coloured People, but soon just loved the album as a whole.  But probably Like it Love it Need it, Between You and Me,  and Mind’s Eye.  But it’s hard to choose.

Postman: the thing about eyeglasses

...the invention of eyeglasses in the 12th century not only made it possible to improve defective vision but suggested the idea that human beings need not accept as final either the endowments of nature or the ravages of time.  Eyeglasses refuted the belief that anatomy is destiny by putting forward the idea that our bodies as well as our minds are improvable. (p.14)

(commenting on the idea that every new technological innovation changes the way we think)

Monday, March 08, 2010

Roll with it

From CT article by Carolyn Arends

But here's the thing: I would be fine with rolling my burdens onto God if I were guaranteed resolution. There's a joke that describes the effects of playing a country song backwards: Your spouse returns, your dog is resurrected, and your truck starts working again. I wish that surrender to God worked the same way.
But faith isn't like that. The biblical witness is that circumstances often get more challenging, not less, when one's way is committed to the Lord. So why roll it onto God if "it" (the need, circumstance, quarrelsome friend, or critical in-law) isn't necessarily going to get fixed?

There are stories about prisoners in Nazi camps who were made to move heavy boulders from one end of a field to the other, only to carry them back again. Many of the men were eventually driven mad, not by the backbreaking nature of the work, but by its futility.

It isn't the experience of being misunderstood (or suffering or poverty) itself that will undo us, but rather the sense that we are enduring hardship to no good end. That's why the apostle Paul emphasized that we do not labor in vain (1 Cor. 15:58). We discover there is no wasted effort or pain, because there is nothing that God cannot redeem.

I have a choice. I can wear myself out pushing the boulders of my life around my prison yard. Or I can be meek, and roll those burdens onto God. I'm not sure exactly what Jesus meant when he said the meek will "inherit the earth," but I've certainly discovered that this world is a better place when I roll it off my shoulders and into his hands.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Postman: Mumford: Moses' clock

Postman quoting Lewis Mumford:

"The clock is a piece of power machinery whose 'product' is seconds and minutes"

Postman continues:
In manufacturing such a product, the clock has the effect of dissociating time from human events and thus nourishes the belief in an independent world of mathematically measurable sequences...

In the process we have learned irreverence towards the sun and the seasons, for in a world made up of seconds and minutes, the authority of nature is superseded.  Indeed, as Mumford points out, with the invention of the clock, Eternity ceased to serve as the measure and focus of human events.  And, thus, though few would have imagined the connection, the inexorable ticking of the clock may have had more to do with the weakening of God's supremacy than all the treatises produced by the philosophers of the Enlightenment;  that is to say, the clock introduced a new form of conversation between man and God, in which God appears to have been the loser.  Perhaps Moses should have included another commandment: Thou shalt not make mechanical representations of time. p11&12

Postman: the changeover

...the decline of the age of typography and the ascendency of the age of television.  This change-over has dramatically and irreversibly shifted the content and meaning of public discourse, since two media so vastly different cannot accommodate the same ideas.  As the influence of print wanes, the content of politics, religion, education, and anything else that comprises public business must change and be recast in terms that are most suitable to television. (p8)

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Hey!

That last one was my 400th post!

#14 Last Days of the Century



A change of direction both from Oldfield and Minty's jazz.

Al Stewart is a bit of a legend, but not because of this album.  It's got rather too much synth and is a bit too poppy in many ways. But I'd take it with me to my desert island because of the imaginative vistas it conjours. As usual, the historical references and allusions abound, not always I have to say in a way that makes sense. But it's a breath of fresh air from the usual grist of the pop mill.

The opening track feels a bit like Year of the Cat without the depth.  But after that favourites include Red Tope, Licence to Steal (an attack on lawyers), Josephine Baker (love it) and the extended metaphor of Antarctica.   Spotify also provides the bonus track about Helen of Troy (there's a phrase you don't often hear)

Monday, March 01, 2010

Badger worry

Not 'taking thought of the morrow' has been a key text in my life, though often I have failed it.  But a question which surfaces every so often is:  how do we plan, and organise for the future, whilst not worrying beyond the evil of this day?  I have frequently said we must do both (not worry and plan), but then kind of held them in tension: trying to do both, and then trying to avoid the apparently unavoidable consequence of being concerned about the morrow:  what will I need, what if it doesn't work, what if, what if...

I think the mistake may be investing oneself in the planning for the future.  That is to say, some planning is always needed - but then we tend to invest our hearts in it much more than we realise, as if our plans are the essential element in tomorrow and if they don't happen then it will disaster - and as a result, fretting then takes place to ensure that they happen. We start living in that hypothetical tomorrow - and a hypothetical tomorrow has so many more possible disasters than the real tomorrow will actually bring, so we start to deal with those unreal multiple disasters and find ourselves exhausted.  Our thoughts of  tomorrow become dominated by the urgency of tomorrow being the shape I planned for it, not with the thought that God is present there to provide.

I suspect the key is to plan for tomorrow, and next week and month and year - but 'on paper' only.  Draw out the necessary plans, but invest our heart in God in today.   We can plan for tomorrow and live in today.  Once we have planned and moved whatever pieces into place as far as we can, we have to say to ourselves: "But tomorrow does not exist for me, it isn't real yet - and therefore stop worrying about it, instead invest your heart in what is real: today"