Whatever else is true, it is emphatically not true that the ideas of Jesus of Nazareth were suitable to His time, but no longer suitable to our time. Exactly how suitable they were to His time is perhaps suggested in the end of His story.
Friday, June 27, 2008
Chesterton: acceptable ideas
Friday, June 20, 2008
Baker: Trinitarian community
The fulfilment of God's image is when we enter into the Trinitarian indwelling (keep the greatest commandment) and reproduce it among ourselves (keep the second, which is like the first). this is our eternal purpose; to do this is life...
God, having set Himself the task of making a creature that dwells in a community resembling the community of the Trinity, will not rest until He has accomplished all he has said.
Baker, p.93
Fenelon: stubborn sins
Thursday, June 19, 2008
The value of the unborn
Care worker Christopher Sloggett, 21, admitted driving without due care and attention.
He had lost control of his vehicle on the A39 at Playing Place a year ago and hit an oncoming car.
His badly injured ex-girlfriend in the front seat, 20-year-old Kim Quigley, had been eight months pregnant by another man at the time and lost her unborn boy, Thomas.
Serious charges of causing death by driving could not be brought against Sloggett because the law regards a person as alive only once they have taken their first independent breath outside the womb.
After the court case at Truro Magistrates last week, former nursery nurse Miss Quigley, now 21, called for a change in the law.
The police officer in charge of the case, Motor PC Claire Hawkins, said: “While we have to accept the sentence was proportionate to the charge brought against Mr Sloggett, nothing can reflect the terrible loss that Miss Quigley has suffered.
“Unfortunately, legislation does not account for the death of an unborn child and it was therefore not possible to bring a more serious charge before the court.”
Unfortunately for this lady she doesn't stand much of a chance. The lobby fighting for the 'rights of women' would prevent her very logical wish - they cannot afford to allow the unborn to be termed as 'alive', the psychological effect of this would reinforce the very gradual rise in support for unborn children. And if they are alive and human, then what? Where would it all end? We would have to take responsibility for our actions. Deary me.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Ideas from Postman
...the adoration of technology pre-empts the adoration of anything else...[religious symbols must] be made impotent as quickly as possible - that is, drained of sacred, or even serious, connotations. The elevation of one god requires the demotion of another.(an example would be the way clergy are portrayed in the media as idiots or terrorists)
Those who resist 'technopoly' are people-
who pay no attention to a poll unless they know what questions were asked and why...people who:
- refuse to accept efficiency as the pre-eminent goal of human relations
- who have freed themselves from the belief in the magical power of numbers
- who are, at least, suspicious of the idea of progress, and who do not confuse information with understanding
- who do not regard the aged as irrelevant
- who take the great narratives of religion seriously
- who know the difference between the sacred and the profane, and who do not wink at tradition for modernity's sake.
Quoted in Dawn, p.271, 282 &283
Friday, June 13, 2008
I suppose it was going to happen
Monday, June 09, 2008
Interruption.........
Who would have thought it?
Thanks again, Mintiernational.
Degree of Image
Humanity is made both to represent God, to stand in his place, and also to resemble him to such a degree that we might be mistaken for him.
Baker, Covenant and Community, p68-69
Thursday, June 05, 2008
What to do in danger
Thou mayest do in this as it is in thy heart. If it is in thy heart to fly, fly: if it be in thy heart to stand, stand. Anything but a denial of the truth. He that flies, has warrant to do so; he that stands, has warrant to do so. Yea, the same man may both fly and stand, as the call and working of God with his heart may be. Moses fled (Ex. 2:15); Moses stood (Heb 11:27). David fled (1 Sam. 19:12); David stood (1 Sam. 24:8). Jeremiah fled (Jer. 37:11-12); Jeremiah stood (Jer. 38:17). Christ withdrew himself (Luke 19:10); Christ stood (John 18:1-8). Paul fled (2 Cor. 11:33); Paul stood (Act 20:22-23). . . . There are few rules in this case. The man himself is best able to judge concerning his present strength, and what weight this or that argument has upon his heart to stand or fly. . . Do not fly out of a slavish fear, but rather because flying is an ordinance of God, opening a door for the escape of some, which door is opened by God's providence, and the escape countenanced by God's Word (Matt. 10:23).
John Bunyan, Advice to Sufferers
Monday, June 02, 2008
Pleasing people the wrong way
This writer fears that we are on the verge of seeing happen what happened in the 1950s to mainstream Protestant churches: they retooled for people who were casually attracted and liked big parking lots, spectacle, and low demands; and people left as easily as they came. You can see that I lean toward the search for the dynamisms in the longer-pull worship traditions and against the emerging market orientation. But I am never cocksure abut this and try to listen.
Martin E Marty, quoted in Dawn Reaching Out... p258